Luma (in her 1/13/008 post) put me up to this. She requested a la meme a snapshot of my desktop via Thumbsnap. I experimented with this and uploaded the Hillary Clinton for President website banner instead. To Luma's main point, though, it's a good idea to compress the number of icons parked there, for more economical use. Still, my actual desktop (before and after) remains "top secret." Ha! Check out "Como anda a sua área de trabalho?," Luma's 13 Janeiro, 2008 postagem if you want to see her nifty streamlined redesign, pipoles. . . . .
Tomorrow, I'll vote for Clinton in the "controversial" Michigan Primary. Gloria Steinem recently wrote "Women Are Never Front-Runners," an inspiring op-ed piece published in The New York Times (1/8/008) that nicely argues why voters should go for Clinton in 2008. Indeed. It's time for a woman president of the USA.
Today's Rune: Fertility.
5 comments:
I don't know...I kind of like the Dems for Romney thing they're pushing over at www.dailykos.com
That sounds like more evil fun
I'd like Clinton more if she wasn't such a lobbyists' whore. I'm afraid the only people she's going to work for are corporate people. Where's Pat Paulsen when you need him??? (Actually, even though he's dead, his campaigning goes on. Google it--you'll see.)
I hate to say it, but the fact that "it's time for a woman president" is not a persuasive argument to me for why we should vote for this particular woman. I would have voted for Elizabeth Dole, though.
Right now I'd go Obama, although Edwards is a close second.
Thanks y'all for the comments!
Bubs, maybe it worked! Somebody voted for a man named MITT, but it wasn't me :->
Lana, I disagree, though you have a good point. Charles, E Dole would have been interesting. Obama and Edwards are fine by me. As for the Republicans in 008, *this particular woman* is better than *any* of *those particular men*!
Post a Comment