Saturday, March 12, 2011
On the Road: Jack Kerouac and the Beat Generation
[I originally posted this five years ago today, in 2006]:
Today is Jack Kerouac's birthday (1922-1969). His reputation has survived quips like Truman Capote's clever if evil line, "that's not writing, that's typing." While he was alive, academia (for the most part) dismissed him as a joke. Now whole courses are taught on the Beats; their books can be found in major bookstores or easily obtained online. They have been absorbed into mainstream culture, and even the originally derisive Cold War term "beatnik" has a nostalgiac ring.
But Beat writing is more about unconventional freedom of movement and alternative lifestyles than it is about nostalgia. There is no uniform philosophy. Some of the Beats embraced Zen Buddhism, some launched cultural and political critiques and jeremiads (Allen Ginsberg's "Howl," Gregory Corso's "Bomb"); Kerouac mostly told stories and chronicled his own life and the comings and goings of key friends. William S. Burroughs started with a variation of crime noir (Junky) and moved through experimentation, drugs, voluntary exile, and the cut-up method (in collaboration with the artist Brion Gysin) to create such controversial works as Naked Lunch. The collective impact on interested parties in the 1960s was enormous, from Bob Dylan straight to the present. So happy birthday, Jack! Today your books live alongside Truman's and everybody be happy.
My sister Vickie told me Jack Kerouac's story when I was a teenager straight out of VMI. The first thing I read was an annotated copy of On the Road from the library, which was perfect because the "critical section" set the novel within an understandable context. The novel itself inspired me in many ways, but perhaps most imporantly it opened up possibilities for striking out on the road and living in unconventional ways. Between that and miraculously surviving a dramatic car wreck completely unscathed (the car flipped over and spun around a few times before landing in a watery ditch), I was ready to GO!
And away I went over the span of just four or five blindingly short years -- to New England with my friend Kenny Randall where we met Baba and Louise Toumajan; to Europe on a college trip where I got to know my friend Bill Caughlin; around the country by car with my sister Linda Stine, visiting relatives and Beat shrines along the way in Denver, San Francsico, New Orleans and elsewhere; to Mardi Gras with Bill; to Europe again, with Suzanne DePalma; to Manhattan and the Beat hangouts there; to Boulder, Colorado, with my friend Evan Farris to visit his sister Amy Farris (now Amy Kilbride) -- I'm talking thirty to forty hour car rides, hallucinatory experiences, for sure --then driving with my sister Vickie Charabati [now Stavish] to St. Paul, Minnesota, where she was moving. And in the middle of all these travels, I got a job at Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill and plugged into the literary world via publishing, as well. Certainly, it all makes more sense now than it did at the time! And certainly no regrets. I still get the travel bug, though I've come to appreciate (and can better afford) airplanes to get from place to place!
Kerouac married Edie Parker of Grosse Pointe; he stayed in the area from time to time, frequenting the still-functioning Rustic Cabins bar in Grosse Pointe Park, and the temporarily defunct Wooden Nickel (on Mack Avenue) in an earlier incarnation [now a sushi joint]. "There's no tragedy in Grosse Pointe," Jack proclaimed then, but if he had lived to see it, he'd come to know that on the contrary, there's plenty of tragedy in Grosse Pointe -- just like everywhere else.
A vast storehouse of Kerouac's papers are now owned by the New York Public Library; pleasingly, the same institution recently acquired William S. Burroughs' papers, too. Burroughs' importance will be better understood in due time.
On the road, adieu for now. . . . .
Today's Rune: Wholeness.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I could argue the other side of their influence on literature simply by saying just because something is still read and thought about doesn't make it great. Mien Kampf, by that standard is great literature.
I understand completely that the Beats were trying to break out of a mold that the depression, the war, the evolving Eisenhower's Military/Industrial complex had set them up for but they too had their kingmaker and one who pointed the finger and said off with their head or fine be a part of my court. Which to my thinking made them just as submissive to the culture they thought they generated. Acolytes of rebellion.
For the most part they WERE junkies, crazed alcoholics and in Kerouac we find a man who never grew up past his mommy and his alcoholism. And in Burroughs case he had to shoot his wife to find name recognition.
Ginsburg though an able poet and reluctant defender of free speech, the moons he was howling for didn't hang that high in the sky.
But then I am certain you know more of that generation's history of being perpetually fucked up better than I do. I for the most part find them disingenuous.
Bukowski on the other hand was of the same generation but at least he was honest in what he was looking for. And it wasn't found in the produce section of a supermarket.
Hey Mark -- thanks for the comments! Overall, it's not that big a deal to me. I like Beat stuff, I like Bukowski and I like Capote, too. All of the above. And all of the below, too. And everything in between, just about.
Post a Comment